science writing

How (not) to write scientific literature

Most people that have studied a science subject at university, has had the pleasure of reading scientific papers and despair over these papers rigid structure and uninspiring language. All of us probably agree that the majority of scientific papers are not pleasurable reading.

The biologist Kaj Sand-Jensen has written an entertaining and ironic little (scientific) paper on the matter, where he gives advice to scientists on how to write consistently boring scientific literature.

He gives the following 10 recommendations

(1) Avoid focus. Try to hide the aim of the research by asking a multitude of questions and introducing several ideas scattered around the text.

Bad science writing

This group takes a critical stance (in a philosophical sense) to science and its interpretations in popular culture, policy and more

There is so much bad science writing out there, it is almost unbelievable. Bad protocols, bad commentary, bad interpretations, bad understanding. We need people who can think. We need them to have a look at these issues:

Syndicate content